Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11800H outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11800H is 2809 days newer than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11800H - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11800H
- Performs up to 29% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 762 vs 589 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 45 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2695 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-11800H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
