Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 1826 days newer than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 27% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 194 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 65 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2774 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |