Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1220 days newer than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 7% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 227 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 60 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
227
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
115 W | TDP | 60 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |