Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7500T outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7500T is 1220 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 167 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 - 35 vs 150 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |