Buy on Amazon
$135
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 2169 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Xeon E5-2680 - 196 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$135
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Processor with Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics - YD2400C5FBBOX
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1976 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-2680
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E5-2680 or Ryzen 5 2400G
Valheim, 1920 x 1080, Highest
37 FPS
$29.7/FPS
Radeon RX 580
Ryzen 5 2400G
8 GB, 128 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,098.88
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
