Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 120 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 67% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 87 vs 52 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
87
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$569.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $569.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |