Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 120 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 155 vs 148 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FPS
155
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 127 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |