Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v2 outperforms Pentium 3556U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v2 and Pentium 3556U have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Pentium 3556U - 162 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 3556U - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3556U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | Intel Pentium 3556U |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 15 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 17.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |