Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 260 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
260
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |