Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2239 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 130 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 423 vs 379 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 20 vs 16 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
423
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$565
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60968 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
640
40.609137055837564%
Multi-Core
3982
42.49279692668872%
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |