Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4710HQ outperforms Xeon E5-2660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4710HQ is 756 days newer than Xeon E5-2660.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4710HQ - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4710HQ
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-2660 - 214 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 - 47 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i7-4710HQ
Mobile • Apr 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 | vs | Intel Core i7-4710HQ |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
