Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2660 v3 outperforms Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2660 v3 is 98 days newer than Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Pentium G3258 - 131 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 - 53 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
129
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |