Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E5-2650 v2 vs FX-8370

Xeon E5-2650 v2 vs FX-8370: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Xeon E5-2650 v2 outperforms FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v2 is 366 days older than FX-8370.

Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2

  • Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8370 - 153 vs 152 FPS
  • Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 95 vs 125 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 16 vs 8 threads
This is a free version of Total War: WARHAMMER III.
Total War: WARHAMMER III

Total War: WARHAMMER III

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 Logo
Xeon E5-2650 v2

Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013


FPS

153

100%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

FPS Winner

AMD FX-8370 Logo
FX-8370

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


FPS

152

99%

Value, $/FPS

$1.82/FPS

100%

Price, $

$276.99

100%

Value Winner

AMD FD8370FRHKBOX FX-8370 Black Edition 8 Core CPU Processor AM3+ 4300Mhz 125W 16MB

Buy for $276.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 204 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 Logo
Xeon E5-2650 v2

Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013

AMD FX-8370 Logo
FX-8370

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 Logo
Xeon E5-2650 v2

Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013


Single-Core

518

100%

Multi-Core

3208

100%

AMD FX-8370 Logo
FX-8370

Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014


Single-Core

501

96%

Multi-Core

2042

63%

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 Logo

Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2

vs
AMD FX-8370 Logo

AMD FX-8370

Sep 1st, 2013Release Date
Sep 2nd, 2014
Xeon E5CollectionFX
Ivy Bridge EPCodenameVishera
Intel Socket 2011SocketAMD Socket AM3+
Server
Segment
Desktop
8Cores8
16
Threads8
2.6 GHzBase Clock Speed
4.0 GHz
3.4 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz
95 W
TDP125 W
22 nm
Process Size32 nm
26.0x
Multiplier20.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.