Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 2060 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 16% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 262 vs 225 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
262
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $260.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |