Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Xeon E5-2643 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2604 days newer than Xeon E5-2643.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 19% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2643 - 188 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2643 - 65 vs 130 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2643 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |