Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 and Xeon E5-2640 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 - 95 vs 115 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-2640 - 211 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 16 vs 12 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2640
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Xeon E5-2670
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 115 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
