Key Differences
In short — FX-9370 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9370 is 462 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 95 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-2640 - 214 vs 213 FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$183
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $183 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |