Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 90 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 124% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 92 vs 41 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
92
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$235.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $235.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |