Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 99 days older than the more expensive Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13400F - 156 vs 148 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $249.99 vs $899.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74993 minutes ago
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74992 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Single-Core
2290
85.92870544090057%
Multi-Core
10745
72.36664870689656%
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |