Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E5-2630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2630.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2630 - 194 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$440
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $440 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |