Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2630.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 16% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-2630 - 248 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
248
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$469.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $469.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |