Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 85 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 36% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 883 vs 649 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
883
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$391
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $391 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |