Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell-E | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |