Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 29% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 214 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-13700
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
