Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 2941 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7700X - 85 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 67% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 266 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
266
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$299.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $299.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3781 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |