Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 29% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 119 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |