Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 3313 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 17% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 196 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$195.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $195.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |