Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3422 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 51% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 267 vs 177 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
267
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.93
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |