Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3228 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 11% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-2420 - 236 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
236
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |