Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 2610 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 12% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2420 - 172 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 16 vs 12 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$285
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |