Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400S outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2400S is 491 days older than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2420 - 116 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
116
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |