Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Xeon E5-1680 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 2389 days newer than Xeon E5-1680 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Rocket League than Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 765 vs 707 FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Xeon E5-1680 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
