Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1680 v4 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1680 v4 is 602 days older than Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4
- Performs up to 3% better in Alan Wake 2 than Ryzen 3 2200G - 110 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
107
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |