Buy on Amazon
$135
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Xeon E5-1650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 2169 days newer than Xeon E5-1650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 3% better in Deathloop than Xeon E5-1650 - 174 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$135
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Processor with Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics - YD2400C5FBBOX
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2730 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1650
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 5 2400G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E5-1650 or Ryzen 5 2400G
Deathloop, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
36 FPS
$30.52/FPS
Radeon RX 580
Ryzen 5 2400G
8 GB, 128 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$1,098.88
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
