Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2424 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 224 vs 186 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 20 vs 12 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
224
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2791 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |