Buy on Amazon
$210
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 1682 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 128 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler - YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E5-1650 v2 or Ryzen 7 2700X
Dying Light 2: Stay Human, 1920 x 1080, High Quality Raytracing
1 FPS
$1399.99/FPS
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
Ryzen 7 2700X
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,399.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
