Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2424 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 20% better in Rust than Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 196 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
