Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-1620 - 219 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$884.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $884.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |