Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3612 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 31% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-1620 - 122 vs 93 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 58 vs 130 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |