Buy on Amazon
$130
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $99
Availability
MSRP in USD: $99
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 2169 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 26% better in FIFA 23 than Xeon E5-1620 - 131 vs 104 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Processor with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics - YD2200C5FBBOX
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5944 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
