Buy on Amazon
$99.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 is 2381 days older than Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Pentium Gold G6405 - 156 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 58 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
153
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium Gold G6405 4.1GHz 4MB Desktop Processor Boxed
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Pentium Gold G6405
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
