Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 122 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7655 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |