Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 83% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 294 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
294
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$521.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $521.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12249 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |