Buy on Amazon
$150
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 1211 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 8% better in Remnant II than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 86 vs 80 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7700T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
86
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7 i7-7700T Quad-core (4 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 1 MB
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i7-7700T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E5-1620 v2 or Core i7-7700T
Remnant II, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
2 FPS
$449.5/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Core i7-7700T
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$899
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
