Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 1211 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 14% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 182 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$167
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $167 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |