Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11800H outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11800H is 2437 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11800H
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 127 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-1607 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-11800H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
