Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1865 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 130 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 29% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 58 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 24 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$587.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |