Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9920X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9920X is 435 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 2% better in God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 174 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $587.46 vs $788.88
- Up to 27% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $3.38 vs $4.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9920X - 32 vs 24 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$587.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
171
98%
Value, $/FPS
$4.61/FPS
73%
Price, $
$788.88
74%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |