Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1211 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 255 vs 254 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
255
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-1607 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
