Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 2193 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 131 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$273.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $273.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |